The Compulsory Process Clause is part of the 6th Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States, and the first ten amendments, also
known as the Bill of Rights. This clause guarantees
you the right to call witnesses to testify in your behalf if you are
charged with a crime, and to compel those witnesses to testify if they
refuse. The Compulsory Process Clause reads like this:
"In all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have
compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his
favor."
Purpose
of the
Compulsory Process Clause
The Compulsory Process Clause protects people from unjust or unfair
criminal accusations by allowing them to call for witnesses who will
testify in their behalf. If the defendant calls for a witness who
refuses to testify, he can request that the state subpoena him. He will
have to obey the subpoena and come in to testify, or be in contempt of
court.
It is very important that the witnesses can be compelled to come in.
Imagine being accused of a crime and not being able to defend yourself.
Maybe someone knows something about the crime, maybe that you couldn't
have been there at the time, because you were them. Or maybe, they know
something about who really did it.
Either way, if you ask them to testify for you, they might be afraid or
embarrassed. They might not want the publicity a trial might bring.
There are many reasons someone might not want to testify in court. If
they refused, you might not have any other way to defend yourself.
With the Compulsory Process Clause guarantee, the state can force the
witness to come in to testify. It might not be very pleasant, but the
Supreme Court and the Founding Fathers judged the right to defend
oneself in court so important that they wrote it into the 6th Amendment
to the Constitution.
Another right that the Compulsory Process Clause establishes is that
you have the right to testify for yourself in your own trial. In some
cases, in both Common Law and in colonial history, defendants could not
testify for themselves in their own trial. The Founding
Fathers abolished that practice because they believed it was
inherently unfair to forbid someone to defend himself. Even the
defendant's testimony obtained through the use of hypnosis is
admissible as part of one's defense!
History
of the
Compulsory Process Clause
The idea of Compulsory Process is a relatively new
one to
English law. The English Common Law, from which all American law is
derived, contained several provisions that were not very favorable to
defendants.
First, if anyone was charged with a crime, he was not allowed to
testify in his own behalf. Common Law reasoned that the testimony of
anyone
in this position would be unreliable because of his personal interest
in the outcome. This seems very unjust to us today because we have held
it as a given that you should be able to defend yourself in
court for several centuries now. But it wasn't always that
way. Even in colonial America, this tradition held. You could not
testify in your own behalf if charged with a crime.
Secondly, if you were charged with certain types of crimes, such as
treason or a felony, under Common Law, you could not call for any
witnesses to testify for you. This custom also passed on to colonial
America and it was still common even after England had abolished the
practice.
After the Revolutionary War, several states added Compulsory Process
Clauses to their constitutions. They wanted to guarantee not only that
defendants could call for witnesses to testify in their behalf, but
also wanted to provide a method to force witnesses to testify if
necessary. The whole idea was to protect the right of the accused to be
able to defend himself.
James Madison
James Madison presented twenty proposed amendments to the Constitution
to the First Congress on June 8, 1789. He did this to appease those who
were in the Anti-Federalist party who believed that the Constitution
did not provide enough protection of individual rights, or enough
restrictions on the government. You
can read James Madison's June 8 speech here.
The Compulsory Process Clause was part of Madison's recommendations
that day. The ideas in the Compulsory Process Clause were so widely
accepted that the representatives in Congress didn't even have any
discussion about it before approving it. Eventually, the Congress chose
twelve amendments to pass on the the states for ratification. Ten of
those were approved by the States. They became law on December 15,
1791. The Compulsory Process Clause became part of the 6th Amendment.
The First Ten Amendments are also known as the Bill of Rights. You
can read more about the Bill of Rights' Purpose here.
Compulsory
Process Clause
in everyday life
The right to have witnesses at trial is not absolute, as with most
provisions in the Bill of Rights, the 6th Amendment's Compulsory
Process Clause can be waived in some instances.
For example, it is understood law that both sides of the case will be
allowed to cross-examine witnesses and evidence. Both sides must inform
the attorneys for the other side of any witnesses or evidence they will
present in the trial and they must inform them ahead of time, in order
for the opposing side to prepare a defense against the witness or
evidence.
If the court finds that the defense did not inform the prosecution
sufficiently early, in order to gain a tactical advantage in the trial,
the judge can bar the witness from testifying.
Another situation that would call for the defense not being able to
obtain a witness occurs in the situation of a crime in which there are
more than one suspects involved, and who refuse to testify in the
trial, pleading their 5th Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination.
In this case, one suspect might wish the other to testify in his
behalf, but the second suspect refuses to testify in order to protect
himself. In this case, the Confrontation Clause guarantee is waived
because the 5th Amendment Self-Incrimination Clause overrides
it. Accomplices in a crime are allowed to testify in each other's
behalf if they choose.
The Court must use its power to compel witnesses to testify for the
defendant if the witness refuses to testify or if the defendant is
having trouble finding him. Sometimes the court will charge the
defendant the cost of finding the witness and bringing him to the
trial. Even if the defendant is broke and cannot pay the costs, the
state has to make every effort to get the witness there or the
Compulsory Process Clause has been violated. You
can read about several interesting and significant Sixth Amendment
Court Cases dealing with the Compulsory Process Clause here.