The Grand Jury Exception Clause excludes people in the armed forces
from the right to indictment by a grand jury. The first part of the
Fifth Amendment, known as the Grand Jury Clause, requires that federal
charges for serious crimes must come by the indictment of a grand jury,
not from a prosecutor alone. This right is not
granted to military personnel or members of the militia, or
national guard, though. The Grand Jury Exception Clause reads like
this, in
bold:
"No person
shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime,
unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases
arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual
service in time of War or public danger."
History of the Grand Jury
Exception Clause
After the Revolutionary War,
the Founding Fathers began to establish a new government that was
eventually enshrined in the Constitution of the United States. There
was a lot of disagreement about how much power the federal government
should have and how much power should be retained by the states. You
can read more about this disagreement on the Purpose of the Bill of
Rights page here.
The framers of the Constitution gave Congress complete control to
regulate the armed forces, although they gave command of the army to
the executive branch. Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 of the
Constitution reads like this:
"The Congress shall have
power... To
make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval
Forces."
It is clear that the framers wanted to keep control of the military in
the hands of the people and not the executive or the judiciary. Why
would they do this? Three reasons are evident. For one, the framers did
not want a handful of unelected judges to have power over the military,
who might use it for personal advantage. This could easily lead to a
military dictatorship, which is what they had just defeated during the
Revolutionary War. Instead, they wanted control of the military spread
out amongst a large group of citizens. This way, it would be much
harder for a corrupt person to take over.
The second reason for giving Congress complete control over regulating
the military, was to ensure that the military would remain strong. They
didn't want a handful of unelected judges to weaken the military right
at the time when it was most needed. Instead, they wanted the people to
be in charge through their representatives in Congress, who would
recognize threats and respond with force if necessary. They also
recognized that the functioning of the military is so important to
guarding the peace, that they didn't wanted a small group of unelected
judges meddling with the operation of the most powerful force in the
nation. It was very important to the framers to keep absolute control
over the military in the people's hands.
A
third reason to keep civilian courts out of military matters is that it
would be very unwise to allow courts and judges, who are far removed
from
the scenes of war, to determine what is proper action on the
battlefield. For example, if a soldier killed an enemy during a battle
it could be viewed by one person as a justified action in combat.
Someone else might look at it and say, the soldier shouldn't have
killed the enemy because the enemy had laid down his gun and was going
to surrender. In the heat of the battle, decisions might be made by a
soldier that would not be made under normal circumstances.
The
Founders left judgments like this up to military rather than civilian
courts. Civilian juries and civilian judges would have a hard time
understanding battlefield conditions and pressures. If soldiers thought
they could be tried in a civilian court when they get home for doing
something they thought was justified on the field of battle, many
soldiers would begin holding back, putting their lives and the lives of
their friends in danger.
Grand
Jury Exception Clause - The military exception
All American citizens are guaranteed the right to an indictment by a
grand jury for serious federal crimes by the 5th Amendment, except for
military personnel. Military personnel, whether on active duty or not,
and members of the militia, which is today's national guard, cannot be
indicted by a federal court. They must be charged in a military court.
The military court has a whole different set of rules by which it
functions that is not determined by the judiciary, but by the Congress
and the military.
If you have ever seen the tv show "JAG," you have a seen a depiction of
a military court. The JAG (which stand for Justice Advocate General)
officers represented are trying military cases. If you have seen the
show, you know that civilians are never tried there, only military
personnel. Military personnel have an entirely separate court system.
Grand
Jury Exception Clause - The 5th Amendment
Due
to their desire to keep control over the military within the
Congress' hands, the Founding Fathers created the Grand Jury Exception
Clause in the 5th Amendment that specifically excludes military members
from the right to indictment by grand jury.
Practically speaking, if a member of the armed services is charged with
a crime, while he is actively serving, or even if he is off duty, he
must be tried by a military court and not in a civilian court. The
military court is not required to use the grand jury process, like
civilian federal courts are. If a person is serving in the militia,
which is today's national guard, he also will be tried in a military
court, whether actively serving or off duty.
Military personnel who are tried by court martial do not have the right
to indictment by grand jury, but they do have other rights.
Throughout British history, military personnel subject to
court martial were given the rights of protection from double jeopardy
and self-incrimination and this policy carried over into American
courts martial. There is a very defined set of regulations guarding the
rights of accused military personnel, but it has been created by the
military and the Congress, rather than by the judiciary.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice grants accused personnel the right
to be informed of the charges against them, the right to have an
attorney, protection from double jeopardy and self-incrimination,
virtually all the rights given in a civilian court, except those
specifically mentioned in the Constitution or inapplicable in a
military setting.