|
Mysteries of Government -
February 27, 1769
Mysteries of Government is an article by Samuel Adams originally published in the Boston
Gazette. Samuel Adams became one of the great leaders of the Revolutionary War.
|
Samuel Adams |
|
Click here for a list of interesting Samuel Adams Facts.
Click here if you would like to read some Samuel Adams Quotes.
Mysteries of Government
Mysteries of Government February 27th, 1769
In the days of the STUARTS, it was lookd upon by some men as a high
degree of prophaness, for any subject to enquire into what was called
the mysteries of government: James the first thundered his anathema
against Dr. Cowel, for his daring presumption in treating of those
mysteries, and forbad his subjects to read his books, or even to keep
them in their houses. In those days passive obedience, non-resistance,
the divine hereditary right of kings, and their being accountable to
God alone, were doctrines generally taught, believd and practiced: But
behold the sudden transition of human affairs! In the very next reign
the people assumd the right of free enquiry, into the nature and end of
government, and the conduct of those who were entrusted with it: Laud
and Strafford were brot to the block; and after the horrors of a civil
war, in which some of the best blood of the nation was spilt as water
upon the ground, they finally called to account, arraignd, adjudgd,
condemnd and even executed the monarch himself! and for a time held his
son and heir in exile. The two sons of Charles the first, after the
death of Oliver Cromwell, reigned in their turns; but by copying after
their father, their administration of government was grievous to their
subjects, and infamous abroad. Charles the second indeed reignd till he
died; but his brother James was obligd to abdicate the throne, which
made room for William the third, and his royal consort Mary, the
daughter of the unfortunate James This was the fate of a race of Kings,
bigotted to the greatest degree to the doctrines of slavery and
regardless of the natural, inherent, divinely hereditary and
indefeasible rights of their subjects.At the revolution, the British
constitution was again restord to its original principles, declared in
the bill of rights; which was afterwards passd into a law, and stands
as a bulwark to the natural rights of subjects. To vindicate these
rights, says Mr. Blackstone, when actually violated or attackd, the
subjects of England are entitled first to the regular administration
and free course of justice in the courts of law--next to the right of
petitioning the King and parliament for redress of grievances and
lastly, to the right of having and using arms for self-preservation and
defence. These he calls auxiliary subordinate rights, which serve
principally as barriers to protect and maintain inviolate the three
great and primary rights of personal security, personal liberty and
private property: And that of having arms for their defence he tells us
is a public allowance, under due restrictions, of the natural right of
resistance and self preservation, when the sanctions of society and
laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression.How
little do those persons attend to the rights of the constitution, if
they know anything about them, who find fault with a late vote of this
town, calling upon the inhabitants to provide themselves with arms for
their defence at any time; but more especially, when they had reason to
fear, there would be a necessity of the means of self preservation
against the violence of oppression. Every one knows that the exercise
of the military power is forever dangerous to civil rights; and we have
had recent instances of violences that have been offerd to private
subjects, and the last week, even to a magistrate in the execution of
his office! Such violences are no more than might have been expected
from military troops: A power, which is apt enough at all times to take
a wanton lead, even when in the midst of civil society; but more
especially so, when they are led to believe that they are become
necessary, to awe a spirit of rebellion, and preserve peace and good
order. But there are some persons, who would, if possibly they could,
perswade the people never to make use of their constitutional rights or
terrify them from doing it. No wonder that a resolution of this town to
keep arms for its own defence, should be represented as having at
bottom a secret intention to oppose the landing of the Kings troops:
when those very persons, who gave it this colouring, had before
represented the people petitioning their Sovereign, as proceeding from
a factious and rebellious spirit; and would now insinuate that there is
an impropriety in their addressing even a plantation Governor upon
public business. Such are the times we are fallen into!
|
|