Fifth Amendment Court Cases
Grand Jury Exception Clause

Each of these Fifth Amendment Court Cases is somehow significant to the way the Supreme Court has interpreted the Grand Jury Exception Clause in the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution. Well, most are significant, some are just interesting!

Fifth Amendment Court Cases - Grand Jury Exception Clause -
Johnson vs. Eisentrager

In a 1950 case called Johnson vs. Eisentrager, the Supreme Court ruled that captured enemy soldiers, who were not citizens of the United States, could not challenge their detention in American courts. Some German World War II prisoners had tried to challenge their detention in civilian American courts after they had been tried and convicted by a military court. The case is particularly interesting because of the current day issue regarding whether or not enemy combatants captured in America's "War on Terrorism" can be allowed to appeal their detention in US civil courts. The Rasul vs. Bush case deals with this in more detail below.

The Court ruled that foreign enemies have no more rights than Americans do. They reasoned that "American citizens conscripted into the military service are thereby stripped of their Fifth Amendment rights and as members of the military establishment are subject to its discipline, including military trials for offenses against aliens or Americans." So, the Court was saying that the military has a well established system of trying its own members and foreign enemy prisoners who are in its custody have no greater rights than the military personnel themselves.

All cases involving the trying of military personnel are handled in military courts, but there are a few exceptions in cases of appeal. For example, some cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court. Federal judges sometime rule on whether or not a military tribunal has jurisdiction in a particular case.

Fifth Amendment Court Cases - Grand Jury Exception Clause -
Burns vs. Wilson

The Supreme Court created a new "right" for military personnel to use federal courts in Burns vs. Wilson, 1953. Military personnel do not claim the same free speech protections that civilians claim because of the nature of the military. Certain forms of disrespectful or contemptuous speech would be harmful to the military's mission.

In this case, the defendant claimed that his free speech rights were being violated by the military and the military court had convicted him. He appealed to the Supreme Court claiming that the military court had not protected his constitutional right to free speech. The Court agreed that military personnel have certain constitutional rights just like civilians, but also said that they may be applied in different ways in the military setting. This created a door for military personnel to appeal cases out of the military courts on the grounds that the military had manifestly refused to consider the defendants claim of having his rights violated. This essentially grants people in the military the same basic rights as civilians.

Guantanamo Bay Detainee

Fifth Amendment Court Cases - Grand Jury Exception Clause -
Rasul vs. Bush

Further, in 2004, the Supreme Court ruled in Rasul vs. Bush that federal district courts could hear challenges by detainees held at America's Guantanamo Bay military base. This remains a very controversial decision in the eyes of many observers. This is the first time that foreign enemies have been granted the right to appeal military punishments outside of the military courts in American history. Many people argue that foreign citizens do not have the rights given to American citizens in the Constitution. Some people say that they should have those rights, whether the Constitution says so or not.

Fifth Amendment Court Cases - Grand Jury Exception Clause -
Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld

In another "War on Terrorism" case, Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld, 2004, the Supreme Court declared that a US citizen who is being held as an enemy combatant by the military must be allowed to challenge his detention in civil courts. In this case, an American citizen was found to be cooperating with the Taliban in Afghanistan. The Court overruled the government's claim that he should be held as an enemy combatant and instead he must be given the same privileges and rights given to any citizen charged with a crime. You can read more about the Hamdi case here.

You Decide

Does the Constitution give the right to decide military cases to the Supreme Court or to the military courts. Has the Supreme Court judged these cases properly, or do they provide another example of the Supreme Court usurping power from the people of the United States?

Read more about the history and meaning of the Grand Jury Exception Clause here and more about the Grand Jury Clause here.

Read more about the history and meaning of the 5th Amendment here.

Learn more about Cases relating to the following Fifth Amendment clauses:

Learn more about these Amendments:

Preamble to the Bill of Rights
Learn about the 1st Amendment here.
Learn about the 2nd Amendment here.
Learn about the 3rd Amendment here.
Learn about the 4th Amendment here.
Learn about the 5th Amendment here.
Learn about the 6th Amendment here.
Learn about the 7th Amendment here.
Learn about the 8th Amendment here.
Learn about the 9th Amendment here.
Learn about the 10th Amendment here.

Read the Bill of Rights here.

Learn more about the Bill of Rights with the following article:

Revolutionary War and Beyond Home

Like This Page?

Facebook Comments

people have commented on this page. Share your thoughts about what you just read! Leave a comment in the box below.
Enjoy this page? Here's the link to add it to your own page

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

  1. Click on the HTML link code below.
  2. Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

© 2008 - 2022  Dan & Jax Bubis